Hydrocarbons occupy a vital role in our life and continue to play an important role for many more years to come. We need to follow all technological innovations to continue our productivity standards to achieve our production targets. Let us extend our vision to achieve this mission.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Water & Wastewater International Online Product Information




Water & Wastewater International

FREE PRODUCT INFO FROM Water & Wastewater International
As a valued subscriber to Water & Wastewater International magazine, we would like to welcome you to the Water & Wastewater International Product Information Service.

Simply click on the link below that will provide you access to supplier company Websites, parts and equipment information.

Water & Wastewater International ONLINE PRODUCT INFORMATION SERVICE



For customer service, email us at wwipublisher@pennwell.com. To unsubscribe from Water & Wastewater International Online Product Information Service, click here.
Using the Water & Wastewater International's Product Information Service, you agree that Water & Wastewater International may send inquiry information to only those companies you visit or request more information on. If you do not wish to receive future Water & Wastewater International Online Product Information Service mailings you may opt-out and we will not share your contact information with marketers.

©copyright 2011  Water & Wastewater International, 1421 S SHERIDAN RD, TULSA, OK, 74112. All product names contained herein are the trademarks of their respective holders. Water & Wastewater International is not responsible for the content or privacy of links to Web sites outside the Water & Wastewater International Network.

*The publisher is not responsible for the contents of the articles herein, and any person following the advice or procedures in these articles does so at his or her own risk. The publisher is not liable for the content or representations in advertisements. Neither the publisher nor any contributor will be responsible for any error of omission in the information provided and/or for the results obtained from the use of such information.

If you have any concerns about this email, its contents or how it is to be used, please read our Privacy Policy

Sunday, April 3, 2011

OIL GAS APRIL UPDATES

Saudi Arabia aims to boost drilling fleet
The National
Rising crude prices and falling OPEC spare capacity have spurred Saudi Arabia to call on oilfield services firms to bolster the kingdom's drilling fleet. Saudi Aramco, the state-owned oil monopoly, met leading services companies in the region last week ...

Drilling rig fire could take days to extinguish
KFDM-TV News
HARDIN COUNTY - From Texas Parks and Wildlife - Authorities estimate it may take 10 days or more to extinguish a natural gas drilling rig fire that started yesterday in the southeastern corner of Village Creek State Park in Hardin County near Lumberton ...

Noble Energy suspends drilling on well near Israel
msnbc.com
AP HOUSTON — Noble Energy Inc. said on Friday that it suspended oil drilling at its Leviathan No. 1 location near Israel, where it had been doing testing. Noble said it found wear on the wellbore casing and needs to bring in additional material and ...

Hundreds welcome flotilla opposed to drilling
New Zealand Herald
Hundreds of people have welcomed a flotilla of yachts into Whangaparaoa Bay in the Bay of Plenty today, which are protesting deep sea oil drilling in the Raukumara Basin off the East Cape. The five yachts were ceremonially welcomed by local iwi, ...

BOEMRE issues eighth permit
The Daily Advertiser
11:00 pm The federal agency tasked with overseeing offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico announced Friday that it has approved its eighth permit since mid February. Drilling had been at a standstill in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon's deadly ...
See all stories on this topic »

Exxon Mobil Likely To Start Oil Exploration Off Central Vietnam This Month -Report
NASDAQ
HANOI -(Dow Jones)- Exxon Mobil (XOM) will likely start exploration drilling off central Vietnam coast late this month, state media said Saturday. The company will begin drilling at Block 119 off Danang city, reported the online news provider VnEconomy ...

Chancellor stands firm on North Sea tax grab
Press and Journal
While the UK Government appears prepared to look at tax concessions on a project-by-project basis, the £2billion-a-year increase in tax on the oil and gas industry will stay in place. Ministers are understood to have been shocked by the backlash from ...

£156m boost for driller after refinancing
Aberdeen-based KCA Deutag said yesterday it had about £156million extra to spend on growing the business internationally after a refinancing deal.
A spokeswoman said that the money would help the international drilling and engineering contractor to break into new markets, including Brazil, and increase its presence in areas such as south-east Asia.


Friday, April 1, 2011

Offshore Rig Utilization updated 4/1/2011

Current Competitive Offshore Rig Utilization by Region
Africa - West 80.7%  (46/57)
Asia - SouthEast 67.7%  (65/96)
Europe - North Sea 80.0%  (60/75)
Mediterranean 68.2%  (15/22)
MidEast - Persian Gulf 75.5%  (71/94)
N. America - Mexico 63.0%  (17/27)
N. America - US GOM 70.7%  (58/82)
S. America - Brazil 87.3%  (55/63)
updated 4/1/2011
Historical Competitive Offshore Rig Utilization by Region
Below is the breakdown of rig utilization by region of the world for each time period indicated. Utilization numbers are based on a snapshot rig count. Only competitive rigs are included.
Region Current Month Ago 6 Months Ago 1 Year Ago
Africa - Other 33.3%  (1/3) 33.3%  (1/3) 66.7%  (2/3) 33.3%  (1/3)
Africa - West 80.7%  (46/57) 76.4%  (42/55) 86.5%  (45/52) 95.9%  (47/49)
Asia - Caspian 100.0%  (1/1) 100.0%  (1/1) 100.0%  (1/1) 100.0%  (1/1)
Asia - Far East 75.0%  (18/24) 76.0%  (19/25) 80.8%  (21/26) 90.9%  (20/22)
Asia - South 94.4%  (34/36) 94.3%  (33/35) 87.1%  (27/31) 88.9%  (32/36)
Asia - SouthEast 67.7%  (65/96) 68.8%  (66/96) 83.7%  (72/86) 69.9%  (58/83)
Australia 100.0%  (10/10) 100.0%  (9/9) 90.9%  (10/11) 76.9%  (10/13)
Black Sea 0.0%  (0/4) 0.0%  (0/4) 33.3%  (1/3) 50.0%  (2/4)
Europe - East 25.0%  (1/4) 25.0%  (1/4) 33.3%  (1/3) 50.0%  (1/2)
Europe - North Sea 80.0%  (60/75) 80.0%  (60/75) 88.9%  (64/72) 80.6%  (58/72)
Mediterranean 68.2%  (15/22) 69.6%  (16/23) 59.1%  (13/22) 92.9%  (13/14)
MidEast - Persian Gulf 75.5%  (71/94) 77.7%  (73/94) 78.9%  (75/95) 75.5%  (71/94)
MidEast - Red Sea 50.0%  (7/14) 64.3%  (9/14) 83.3%  (10/12) 80.0%  (12/15)
N. America - Canadian Atlantic 100.0%  (2/2) 100.0%  (2/2) 100.0%  (3/3) 100.0%  (4/4)
N. America - Canadian Pacific 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0%  (0/1)
N. America - Mexico 63.0%  (17/27) 68.0%  (17/25) 71.0%  (22/31) 90.3%  (28/31)
N. America - US Alaska 0.0%  (0/2) 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0%  (0/1)
N. America - US GOM 70.7%  (58/82) 67.5%  (56/83) 67.9%  (53/78) 80.8%  (63/78)
Other 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0%  (0/1) 100.0%  (2/2) 0.0% (/0)
S. America - Brazil 87.3%  (55/63) 85.9%  (55/64) 86.4%  (51/59) 88.7%  (47/53)
S. America - Other & Carib. 83.3%  (5/6) 60.0%  (3/5) 28.6%  (2/7) 60.0%  (3/5)
S. America - Venezuela 90.9%  (10/11) 90.9%  (10/11) 100.0%  (10/10) 100.0%  (11/11)
Worldwide (No Region) 0.0%  (0/3) 0.0%  (0/3) 0.0%  (0/1) 0.0% (/0)
Get utilization and day rate details for every offshore rig. Group results and search for rig utilization data based on more than a dozen criteria.
Historical Competitive Offshore Rig Utilization Highlight
The following graph provides rig utilization rates for the last 3 years based on the number days on contract for the competitive rigs in the region.

Upcoming Utilization Highlights
Jan: N. America - Gulf of Mexico May: Europe - North Sea Sept: MidEast - Red Sea
Feb: N. America - Mexico Jun: Mediterranean Oct: Asia - South
Mar: S. America - Venezuela Jul: Africa - West Nov: Asia - SouthEast
Apr: S. America - Brazil Aug: MidEast - Persian Gulf Dec: Australia

Current Competitive Offshore Rig Utilization by Rig Type
Drill Barge 80.0%  (8/10)
Drillship 72.9%  (43/59)
Jackup 72.1%  (263/365)
Semisub 81.0%  (141/174)
Tender 70.0%  (21/30)
Updated: 4/1/2011
Historical Competitive Offshore Rig Utilization by Rig Type
Below is the breakdown of rig utilization by rig types for each time period indicated. Utilization numbers are based on a snapshot rig count. Only competitive rigs are included.
Rig Type Current Month Ago 6 Months Ago 1 Year Ago
Drill Barge 80.0%  (8/10) 80.0%  (8/10) 80.0%  (8/10) 80.0%  (8/10)
Drillship 72.9%  (43/59) 70.7%  (41/58) 75.0%  (39/52) 89.6%  (43/48)
Jackup 72.1%  (263/365) 73.2%  (267/365) 77.6%  (274/353) 80.5%  (276/343)
Semisub 81.0%  (141/174) 79.2%  (137/173) 84.4%  (141/167) 82.2%  (134/163)
Tender 70.0%  (21/30) 72.4%  (21/29) 79.3%  (23/29) 75.0%  (21/28)
Get utilization and day rate details for every offshore rig. Group results and search for rig utilization data based on more than a dozen criteria.

Historical Offshore Rig Utilization
The following graph provides rig utilization rates for the last 3 years based on the number days on contract for the competitive rigs of this type.
Upcoming Utilization Highlights
Jan: Inland Barge May: Semisubmersible Sept: Drillship
Feb: Jackup Jun: Submersible Oct: Drill Barge
Mar: Drillship Jul: Inland Barge Nov: Semisubmersible
Apr: Drill Barge Aug: Jackup Dec: Tender

Offshore Rig Utilization Spotlight
Each month, a different rig type in a specific region of the world is highlighted to give you a detailed look at utilization trends. view now.

Upcoming Utilization Spotlight
Jan: Brazil Drillships 5000'+ May: GOM Semis 4000'+ Sep: W. Africa ILC 250'+
Feb: Brazil Semis 4000'+ Jun: N. Sea ILC 250'+ Oct: Pers. Gulf ILC 250'+
Mar: Mexico MC 200'+ Jul: N. Sea Semis 1500'+ Nov: S. Asia ILC 300'+
Apr: GOM ILC 300'+ Aug: W. Africa Semis 4000+ Dec: SE Asia ILC 300'+


New Wireless Downhole Reservoir Testing System

Schlumberger announced the release of its new EnACT wireless downhole reservoir testing system for land operations. With this latest downhole testing system, operators can optimize reservoir tests by detecting changes in bottomhole conditions and adjusting test designs in real time.

Two-way communication between surface and downhole tools permits the control of downhole tools and the transmission of bottomhole pressure and temperature data to the surface. Data streamed from the reservoir to the surface, combined with the surface data, can be transmitted to a company's operation center and asset team.

"When reservoir testing, the EnACT wireless system simplifies tool operation for safer downhole testing," said Devan Raj, marketing and technology manager, Schlumberger Testing Services. "Clients can now analyze test data during well flow and make better informed decisions while testing."

The centerpiece of the downhole wireless system is the hub, which contains four independent quartz gauges that provide redundancy and safeguard data capture. The EnACT system has been designed to use the hub with one or more repeaters to extend depth range.

During field testing, the EnACT system proved successful in a variety of conditions in the Middle East and North Africa and direct wireless data transmission was achieved with the hub deployed as deep as 11,200 ft.

BP Spill Study Says BOP Needs Further Work

Last week, the results were released from the forensic study of the blowout preventer (BOP) used on BP Ltd.'s (BP-NYSE) Macondo well in the Gulf of Mexico that blew out last year causing an explosion, fire and eventual sinking of the Deepwater Horizon semi-submersible drilling rig and this nation's greatest offshore environmental accident.  Den Norske Veritas (DNV), the Norwegian engineering and risk-management firm hired by the U.S. Department of the Interior to assess the BOP and determine its role in last year's Deepwater Horizon disaster, after examining and testing the unit recovered from the ocean floor, prepared a 200-page report with a 351-page appendix.  The inspectors' conclusion was that the shear ram valves in the BOP were unable to fully sever the drillpipe as the unit is designed to do because the pipe inside buckled from the well's initial blow-out and was out of alignment that prevented complete closure.  DNV found that the shear rams had closed to within 1.4 inches.  This gap, albeit small, provided sufficient room for an estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil to escape. 

While the report details the failure, the conclusions confirm the early belief of many drilling engineers consulted about the disaster.  The inability of the shear rams to cut the pipe because of it being off center highlight potential problems for companies drilling over-pressured wells.  The buckling of the pipe was due to the high pressure fluids roaring up the drilling pipe and annulus lifting the pipe until it hit an obstacle.  At that point, the momentum of the pipe and pressures and heat of the flows resulted in its bending.

Exhibit 10.  Why BP's Macondo Well Spilled Oil
Why BP's Macondo Well Spilled Oil
Source:  The Wall Street Journal

The report quickly generated further criticism of the offshore oil and gas industry and its safety procedures in drilling deepwater wells that tend to exhibit high formation pressures.  All facets of the oil and oilfield service industry involved in drilling these wells is working on ways to improve the performance of the drilling and safety equipment, especially the BOP.  There still remain unanswered questions about what actually caused the well to blow out and there will be more information and hypotheses presented down the road, but the DNV report was the last major report on the equipment involved in the accident.  The belief of most observers is that the Deepwater Horizon disaster was the result of a confluence of questionable decisions and actions by all parties involved that resulted in the creation of an unbalanced pressure differential between the downhole formation and the equipment designed to hold back that pressure. 

Criticism of the DNV report came immediately from political opponents of offshore drilling including Rep. Edward Markey (D., Mass.) who said, "This report calls into question whether oil-industry claims about the effectiveness of blowout preventers are just a bunch of hot air."  The man responsible for overseeing U.S. offshore drilling rules until he retired in 2009, Elmer Danenberger III, was quoted by The Wall Street Journal as saying, "They have to rethink the whole design," meaning the BOP.  The DNV report concluded that the BOP failure was due to a design flaw and not the operation, abuse or maintenance of the BOP by the companies involved in drilling the Macondo well. 

The BOP in question was manufactured by Cameron International (CAM-NYSE), the leading provider to the drilling industry of such units for over 90 years.  The BOP has been the industry's last and best defense against well pressures, which often came as a result of encountering pockets of higher-pressured natural gas at shallower depths while drilling a well.  In fact, the BOP that became the signature product for Cameron was developed in response to several high-pressure well workover accidents in 1922.  The co-founder and majority owner of then Cameron Iron Works, James Abercrombie, was also a successful contract driller with a history of putting out well fires and blow-outs, long before Red Adair made the occupation of fire-fighting glamorous. 

In late 1921, Mr. Abercrombie secured a contract to work over a troublesome well in the Hull field in Liberty County, northeast of Houston.  This was a field with many small pockets of high pressured gas.  In the course of working over wells in this field, Mr. Abercrombie's company had lost its newest and best rig and had encountered three blowouts.  While each of the blowouts resulted in lost equipment, fortunately no one was hurt.  The episode, however, focused Mr. Abercrombie on ways to design equipment that could be used to prevent wells from blowing out.  Originally, he had used an elementary blowout preventer called a "boll weevil."  It was essentially a piece of heavy-gauge pipe surrounded by a thick lead casing.  There was stopcock on top of the arrangement.  If it was suspected that a well might blowout, the unit was slipped over the well's casing and the stopcock closed.  The unit proved impractical as a well containment device but mainly it was used to try to give the drilling workers time to get away from the rig before the well blew.

There was another preventer on the market designed to improve on the "boll weevil" and Mr. Abercrombie purchased one of them to use on his next well workover in the Hull field.  Unfortunately it, too, failed to prevent another blowout.  Mr. Abercrombie came up with the idea of a ram-type preventer with the faces of the rams closing in on the drillpipe in order to close off the pressure in the well.  With a sketch of the concept, Mr. Abercrombie went to his co-founder and partner, Henry Cameron, the next morning and sketched out his concept in the sawdust and dirt of the machine shop's floor.  With a casting produced by Howard Hughes' nearby shop, Mr. Cameron machined the design.  A patent application was filed on April 14, 1922, but patent number 1,569,247 was not issued until January 12, 1926. 

As the unit was tested it was discovered that it leaked when pressure increased.  Mr. Cameron designed a fix whereby the increasing pressure would force open a notch in the corner of the ram face and force it to close tighter.  Patent number 1,498,610 was issued as a modification to the original BOP design but before the original patent was even granted.  By adding steel and cast iron parts to the BOP and being able to guarantee the unit would work to shut off 2,000 pounds of flowing pressure, the orders started coming in, not only from domestic companies in Texas, Louisiana and California, but also for use in foreign locations such as Mexico and Venezuela.  The Cameron Iron Works company was on its way to a glorious history that continues today.  [Much of this history about Cameron comes from the book, Mr. Jim, by Patrick J. Nicholson.]

We have high confidence that the engineers in the drilling business will figure out how to improve the performance and safety of the drilling process, just as they have for the past 150+ years.  Well control episodes have occurred throughout the history of the petroleum industry.  The Deepwater Horizon was the latest and most devastating, both due to the loss of 11 lives and the environmental damage to the Gulf of Mexico from the oil spill.  The evidence from the investigations of the disaster continues to show the Macondo well blowout was an accident.  All aspects of our daily lives, including the energy, involve risks.  We need to better understand the risks and their potential ramifications.  Importantly, we need to keep a perspective on risk and our risk tolerance.  We don't stop driving after a car accident.  We don't stop flying after a plane accident.  We shouldn't stop drilling after a drilling accident. 

G. Allen Brooks works as the Managing Director at Parks Paton Hoepfl & Brown. Reprinted with permission of PPH & B.

Thanks for visiting the site and your interest in oil and gas drilling

free counters